{"id":104,"date":"2014-07-29T19:49:00","date_gmt":"2014-07-29T19:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/blog\/2014\/07\/29\/tactical-tuesday-advice-for-self-editing_29\/"},"modified":"2015-11-25T12:22:15","modified_gmt":"2015-11-25T19:22:15","slug":"tactical-tuesday-advice-for-self-editing_29","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/tactical-tuesday-advice-for-self-editing_29\/","title":{"rendered":"Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0in; text-indent: 27.0pt;\">\nWhile different editors might wince over certain areas of<br \/>\nediting, I believe I can come up with a few items that make a less than<br \/>\nfavorable impression upon the majority:<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<u>Targeting the wrong publisher<\/u>: Yes, we can tell when an author hasn\u2019t done his marketing<br \/>\nresearch before submitting a manuscript. How? Manuscripts are over the word<br \/>\ncount. An imprint who publishes solely romance receives an action\/thriller.<br \/>\nBetter yet, the editor of a fiction publisher begins his review and discovers<br \/>\nthe manuscript presented is a non-fiction book on why readers should never read<br \/>\nfiction.<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<u>Ungodly subject matter<\/u>:<br \/>\nWe\u2019re specifically talking editors who edit for Christian houses. It\u2019s safe to<br \/>\nassume that most editors in Christian houses are Christian. I shudder to think<br \/>\nthey are not, but with some of the subjects published recently, one may never<br \/>\nknow. However, as a Christian who happens to be an editor, I don\u2019t want certain<br \/>\nwords or situations to come before my eye to enter into my mind, and protecting<br \/>\nthe reader is of utmost importance to me. Curse words and taking readers into<br \/>\nthe bedroom for explicit scenes is something that the majority of Christian<br \/>\npublishers do not allow. Even Christian imprints held by secular houses<br \/>\nsometimes hold to a very strict code of conduct. When an author presents such<br \/>\nscenes and language, they often cite \u201creality.\u201d The first question to ask in<br \/>\nthat regard is whose reality. Yes, Christians face everyday situations, and<br \/>\nthey don\u2019t live in a bubble away from the world, but Christian authors ought<br \/>\nnot bring the world to Christians or to non-Christians they are trying to<br \/>\nreach.<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<u>Racial slurs and prejudicial references<\/u>: An author might feel that authenticity is raised when a<br \/>\nderogatory term is used to denote a race or nationality within a novel. Yes, a<br \/>\nstory can be layered in such a way that when one character uses a derogatory<br \/>\nterm, the reader understands the ugly nature of that character. However, that<br \/>\nsort of use should always be kept to a minimum and should be very necessary to<br \/>\nthe story\u2014with a lesson to be learned from it. A lack of regard for the<br \/>\nfeelings of others (no matter the race or ethnicity) is a sure way to garner<br \/>\nthe ire of an editor. As a funny example, I once used the term \u201cFlorida<br \/>\ncracker\u201d is a novel to describe a much beloved character. The use highly<br \/>\noffended a critique partner who was not familiar with the term. Floridians and<br \/>\nGeorgians are proud to be called \u201cCrackers\u201d as it simply states that we are<br \/>\nnatives of our state. However, the term has been hijacked, and I was thankful<br \/>\nfor the heart of the woman who took offense. If the term upset her, how many<br \/>\nothers might it have upset in print? The moral of the story: always be careful<br \/>\nand sensitive in this regard.<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<u>Lack of Research<\/u>: The<br \/>\nbest example I have of this one is a review I did (not as an editor) of a<br \/>\npre-Civil War historical in which the KKK was said to be causing<br \/>\ntrouble&nbsp;in the area (the key here is pre-Civil War). Another<br \/>\nstory&nbsp;was written about the history of a specific locale. The author<br \/>\nmisspelled the locale throughout the entry. That\u2019s basic research, but when<br \/>\nsubmitting a manuscript for review, especially a historical novel, it is best<br \/>\nto have your research well documented. You may not have to present it to an<br \/>\neditor, but there are instances when I have researched an event or timeline in<br \/>\nthe story, and I\u2019ve come up with different information. How refreshing it is<br \/>\nwhen the author writes back and cites the information for this non-expert on<br \/>\nthe subject, and I learn something new, but how disappointing it is when I<br \/>\nlearn the author did no research at all.<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\nI&#8217;m sure my editor pals could add some more pet peeves to<br \/>\nthe list, but I&#8217;ll leave it at this.<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 27pt;\">\nHappy editing.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: 36px;\">\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"MsoNormal\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 12pt; text-decoration: underline; text-indent: 36px;\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 12pt; text-indent: 36px;\">\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While different editors might wince over certain areas of editing, I believe I can come up with a few items that make a less than favorable impression upon the majority: Targeting the wrong publisher: Yes, we can tell when an author hasn\u2019t done his marketing research before submitting a manuscript. How? Manuscripts are over the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[504],"tags":[21,65,66],"class_list":["post-104","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-editing-writing-advice","tag-editing-advice","tag-editing-mistakes","tag-editor-pet-peeves"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pelicanbookgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}